9/11 And The War on Freedom
I was in London when the airplanes crashed into the World Trade Centre – and viewed the shocking pictures from the street, looking at TVs inside an adjacent shop.
I have never accepted the official government-mandated conspiracy theory, that Osama Bin Laden was responsible. Besides, he never put his hand up after and said so, something I’m sure he would have done if he had been responsible.
9/11 was the launch pad for the so-called “war on terror”, which I prefer to define as a war on freedom. I say that because since that fateful day we have witnessed the disintegration of the American Dream. Whatever America was, it isn’t any longer – and all as a result of the impetus given to the US government’s totalitarian impulse since 9/11.
Nor did I accept that aircraft could bring down two huge buildings in a free-fall demolition-type of destruction – and even bring down the third building, without any aircraft hitting it at all.
To me it has always had the smell of a “false flag” operation – something carried out with the purpose of pointing the finger at an enemy and being used as a catalyst for going to war.
To question 9/11 is to become a heretic – a non-believer in the accepted truth. In fact, in my experience many people don’t believe the official line, but are afraid to speak out publicly. But all that is changing, and I see a new push from a wide range of courageous people to bring this subject into the mainstream of public discourse.
I’m not so much interested in alternate conspiracy theories, but facts that dispute the official conspiracy theory. And it appears that these facts are piling up.
There are new demands for a real investigation into 9/11. An investigation that is not political and does not have limited terms of reference.
One of the leading groups pushing for this is Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth – which consists of over 1,000 professional engineers and architects plus a growing band of supporters. They have amassed a considerable amount of evidence that doesn’t square with the official story.
Another sane voice that is questioning the official line is Paul Craig Roberts, Assistant Secretary to the Treasury under Ronald Reagan’s first presidential term. His recent essay The Road to Armageddon is well worth a read.
What makes a new investigation so important is that 9/11 was a turning point, an event of monumental significance, which became the justification for the waging of the “war on terror”. If it was proven that 9/11 was some sort of inside job, a false flag operation, it would undermine that whole “war on terror” enterprise – and perhaps save us from a potential World War III scenario.
I think there is a momentum building up, and wouldn’t be at all surprised if this doesn’t end up being a major story before 2010 is up.
I totally agree with you. I have a DVD that shows all. It was an implosion, not an explosion!!
America, I weep for you!!
Thank you for your excellent analysis of the BIG LIE of 9/11. My husband is a member of the organization you mentioned, AE911 Truth. As an engineer, he knows that the “official conspiracy theory” put out by the government is a load of BS. Our horror and disgust at what occurred in the U.S. after 9/11 led us to expatriate to Panama last year.
I certainly hope you’re right that the truth about 9/11 will finally come out. It’s the only thing that could possibly save America from what it is doing to itself.
“Iraq War Veteran Calls for Suspending the Pledge of Allegiance!”
http://www.BlandyLand.com
Daniel Edd Bland III
Finally David, you have taken an official stand. It has become abundantly clear that this WAS a false flag and probably was perpetuated by factions in the US military and members of Mossad. We are all aware of the actions of Mossad and their involvement in many other false flag episodes that have lured not only the USA but other countries into confrontations with suspected individuals or organizations that are completely innocent.
Any logical person has to simply look at the 9-11 report to see the flaws as well as new evidence that has emerged concerning the demolition of the towers to come to the same conclusion that many have already accepted. The government of the USA and Israel were behind the
bombing and collapse of the 3 towers and are guilty of the murders of 3500 innocent citizens who they call collateral damage.
It will take the will of the American people to get to the truth.
Dr Bob
Watever, the war on freedom has been out all over the world. I had a serious confrontation with the security guys, demanding the presence of the Federal Police, in Sao Paulo’s airport when we had to go through a full security check…10 meters after we came out of the plane. On the other hand, we could almost walk away at Montevideo.
There is a really good BBC series explaining how to build a war like this. A war against the unknown. “The power of nightmares”. 3 parts, 1h. each. Really insightful.
I am STUNNED by the fact that there are still crackpots out there claiming that the US, Israel (fill in whichever villain is in fashion with the tinfoil hat community at the moment) blew up the twin towers.
Apart from the inherently preposterous notion that a secret could be kept that would have involved thousands of people, not one of whom, so the nutcase theory inevitably goes, would have leaked a word of it…..there are a few other little problems. Like the film of the planes crashing into the buildings. Fake, no doubt.
Of course the more time that passes, the easier it is for the no-hopers who always love a conspiracy as it makes their miserable little lives seem more interesting, to claim conspiracy. Some of them no doubt are in the loony toons club that also swears that men never walked on the moon.
It really saddens me to think that a free society, in which, despite an increasingly intrusive government one still has access to unlimited information, that there are people so far down the intellectual food chain that nut house theories like this can be seriously discussed.
Robert, the use of ad hominem to counter a reasonable argument undermines your own opinion. A few issues you don’t address though. Of course planes hit the building. It’s just that planes crashing into buildings don’t cause them to free fall into their own footprint – as is typical of a demolition. And seeing as no plane crashed into the third building, and yet it free-fell the same way, surely raises legitimate questions. If you took the time to watch the video from the Architects & Engineers website I think you’d find that a lot of very reasonable people – who understand physics, chemistry and construction – make a perfectly rational case for questioning the official conspiracy story. As to thousands of people being needed to mastermind an alternative method of destroying the buildings, I don’t see why. And setting up straw man arguments like “no men on the moon” or “no planes crashed into the buildings” in order to discredit those who simply don’t believe everything they are told, and who have valid cause for scepticism, does nothing for your own position.
There are perfectly sane people who question the official conspiracy theory – as this panel discussion shows.
And here’s another link worth looking at:
Proof That 9/11 Truthers Are Dangerous